Forum anticoagulants Strona Główna anticoagulants
Buy anticoagulants online
 
 FAQFAQ   SzukajSzukaj   UżytkownicyUżytkownicy   GrupyGrupy   GalerieGalerie   RejestracjaRejestracja 
 ProfilProfil   Zaloguj się, by sprawdzić wiadomościZaloguj się, by sprawdzić wiadomości   ZalogujZaloguj 

Nick Hodgson Answers on Steven Spielberg director

 
Napisz nowy temat   Odpowiedz do tematu    Forum anticoagulants Strona Główna -> Forum testowe
Zobacz poprzedni temat :: Zobacz następny temat  
Autor Wiadomość
zvswgogna




Dołączył: 22 Maj 2013
Posty: 138
Przeczytał: 0 tematów

Ostrzeżeń: 0/5
Skąd: England

PostWysłany: Wto 18:13, 07 Sty 2014    Temat postu: Nick Hodgson Answers on Steven Spielberg director

Nick Hodgson Answers on Steven Spielberg director
Steven Spielberg (director): What are some mindblowing facts about Steven Spielberg?
The film Poltergiest (1982) was cowritten and produced by Steven Speilberg and directed by Tobe Hooper. There has been a lot of suggestion through the years that Speilberg actually directed the film himself or at least took a far more active creative role on set than a producer normally would. The film itself feels very Speilbergian and it is notable that it is by far the most successful in Tobe Hooper career. According to Wikipedia Speilberg had a clause in his contract that said he couldn direct any other films while ET was in production (at the same time as Poltergest) and consequently he took on a role despite much heavier creative involvement.
Movies: Am I the only film buff on Quora who thinks Steven Spielberg is a popular culture icon, rather than a great director? If for some reason, you agree with me, why do you?
You possibly are I can speak for the rest of the film buffs on QUORA.
Steven Speilberg is without a doubt one of the most naturally talented directors working in film today. That his particular directing skills have meshed with the sensibilitiy of a vast audience is a testament to his talent not a reason to discount him as a director,[url=http://www.sport.fr/business/louisvuitton.html]louis vuitton femmes[/url].
Jaws (1975) was a masterpiece of direction. Except the director. Who, beginning with Jaws, went on to achieve the greatest hot streak of critical and commerical success in cinema history.
Jaws (1975), Close Encounters of the Third King (1977), Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981) and ET The Extra Terrestrial (1982). Any of these films would be a standout on any other directors resume. For them to all appear on Speilberg filmography is down right amazing. Particularly the last film on that list ET which is probably the most perfectly crafted film of the second half of the 20th Century.
Post ET any film was going be a let down. The remaining Indiana Jones sequels (or at least the next two let not refer to number 4) were well crafted and certainly entertaining but not quite as good as the first one was. The Color Purple (1985) is vastly underrated. Empire of the Sun (1987) is one area will I agree with you the film . (more)Loading.
Movies: How do you think Stanley Kubrick would have ended the movie Artificial Intelligence, a 2001 movie that was Kubrick last movie he had anything to do with, if Steven Spielberg hadn ended the movie?
I think Stanley Kubrick would have ended AI in exactly the same way Spielberg ended it as according to Wikipedia (I quote in a minute) Spielberg stayed absolutely faithful to Kubrick script for the final 30 minutes of the film. was very successful (and the 4th highest earner of the year) but it didn do quite so well in America, because the film, so I told, was too poetical and intellectual in general for American tastes. Plus, quite a few critics in America misunderstood the film, thinking for instance that the Giacomettistyle beings in the final 20 minutes were aliens (whereas they were robots of the future who had evolved themselves from the robots in the earlier part of the film) and also thinking that the final 20 minutes were a sentimental addition by Spielberg, whereas those scenes were exactly what I wrote for Stanley and exactly what he wanted, filmed faithfully by Spielberg."
Movie Directors: Which directors, according to you, have bridged the gap between "commercial success" and "critical acclaim"?
Can I turn this question around and suggest that most/ if not all directors who have achieved critical success have also achieved commercial success at some point. And that the most consistent commercially successful directors of the recent era are also by and large critically successful too. Examples include: Spielberg, Nolan, Cameron, Zemekis, Scorcese, Scott, Eastwood, Jackson, Stone etc etc.
The one exception might be Michael Bay but I would argue he is a talented film maker in a technical sense but a lousy judge of scripts in a critical sense. Or maybe he is simply too type cast now? All I know is I love Armageddon.


Post został pochwalony 0 razy
Powrót do góry
Zobacz profil autora
Wyświetl posty z ostatnich:   
Napisz nowy temat   Odpowiedz do tematu    Forum anticoagulants Strona Główna -> Forum testowe Wszystkie czasy w strefie EET (Europa)
Strona 1 z 1

 
Skocz do:  
Możesz pisać nowe tematy
Możesz odpowiadać w tematach
Nie możesz zmieniać swoich postów
Nie możesz usuwać swoich postów
Nie możesz głosować w ankietach

fora.pl - załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Regulamin